PR/PR is a full-service boutique publicity agency specializing in professional speakers, consultants, and non-fiction authors. We place our clients in front of their target audience through print media and online sources.

Author Archive for Carter Breazeale – Page 43

Gambling With The Truth

We’re officially a quarter-way through the 2015 NFL season. The standards of football season are all here: Sunday bars are full to the brim, the Jaguars are an absolute dumpster fire and Tom Brady is still dismantling his opponents to the point of embarrassment. But there’s a new facet, as well. Even if you’ve only casually watched a game so far, you’ve already been beaten over the head with advertising from FanDuel and DraftKings, one-day “fantasy sites” that allow you to deposit funds into an account, select players for your team and win/lose money based on the outcome. These commercials are wall-to-wall with testimonials from users who claim to have won X dollars (usually followed by 5 or 6 zeros) by playing “fantasy football” on either site.

Sounds familiar right? Yeah, it’s essentially gambling. Gambling dressed up as fantasy football—another staple of the season that typically involves a group of friends. But as opposed to being season long commitments with one entry fee due prior to the draft (in which you compete against the same group of people,) DraftKings and FanDuel have taken the playing model to game-to-game. They’ve taken a 401K and begun day trading.

I will go on record to state that I participate in FanDuel (and lose) every weekend, so I have no axe to grind them. My only qualm is pretending that it’s not gambling.

Scott Van Pelt of ESPN echoed that sentiment recently on SportsCenter (surprising because both sites have spent boatloads of money advertising on the network.)

There’s a certain cognitive dissonance at work here, committing money week-in and week-out that is entirely dependent on the outcome of a sporting event. But regardless of the grey area in which these websites exist, their profits reflect a massively growing industry. So much so that in the first week of this NFL season they combined for more cash than traditional Vegas sportsbooks. Despite the slippery slope, FanDuel and DraftKings’ member-bases continue to grow exponentially. But if the prospect of throwing money into a bottomless pit every week won’t dissuade users from participating, what will?

Allegations that they games are rigged.

The New York Times broke a story yesterday that alleges employees from each site are collecting information on the bets and then using that information on the rival’s website. With knowledge such as which players are being picked the most, individuals can greatly increase their odds for winning the biggest prize. The story revolves around a DraftKings employee who utilized his company’s internal data to win on FanDuel—to the tune of $350,000.

Everyone knows The House always wins, but it’s easier to turn a blind eye when you don’t know how. It will be interesting to see how this story unfolds, and the impact it will have on these daily fantasy sites. Will regulations be put in place? Will they be outlawed, like online gambling websites? We’ll have to wait and see.

Water on Mars!

How fantastically coincidental that in the week the new Matt Damon film The Martian opens nationally, NASA makes a major announcement: there’s flowing water on Mars! Long theorized but lacking proof, the space agency announced yesterday that they have confirmed the existence liquid water on the Red Planet.

What’s the intimation here? Martians!

This discovery is massive for the future possibility of manned missions to Mars, as liquid water increases the possibility of extraterrestrial life—even at the microbial level. Back in July I wrote about the absolute need to continue funding NASA, and this week’s announcement is even further proof that a well-backed space program benefits humanity as a whole.

The Martian, the upcoming film, was originally a science fiction novel about an astronaut stranded on Mars and forced to forge his own survival until help arrives. Creating shelter, farming food on another planet—think Gary Paulsen’s Hatchet in space. NASA’s discovery of water on Mars makes this work of fiction seem ever closer to reality (hopefully without all of the getting stranded on Mars stuff.) It’s an exciting time to be a fan of science.

Hopefully the announcement of flowing water on Mars fast tracks future projects and missions to the Red Planet, because it shows that no matter how much we think we know, there’s always more to explore.

The Dislikes are Coming

Facebook cynics, rejoice! Your years of social media discontent have been acknowledged, and the Great White Buffalo of Facebook features is finally coming: the “Dislike” button.

After years of ignoring the groups and petitions of thousands of users, Mark Zuckerberg finally announced that a dislike button is in the works. But before you malcontents begin to jump for joy, take a moment to read the fine print. The aim of the Facebook’s “Dislike” button will reportedly be to clear up any confusion on “liking” negative posts, such as deaths and natural disasters.

“We lost Scruffles today, he was a great dog.”

Facebook User Likes This”

Maybe that clears up the projected purpose of the new-but-long-desired function. It’s to convey empathy, not disagreement. An awkward situation always presents itself when “liking” a post that isn’t positive.

As expected, there has already been some backlash after the announcement. In an age where cyberbullying is a serious issue, many wonder if the “Dislike” button will foster an online environment that promotes it. That’s why Facebook needs to tread lightly with this rollout, and cover all its bases so that a feature designed to show compassion isn’t used to display displeasure on photos or status updates.

What are your thoughts on Facebook’s “Dislike” button?

Holographic Facebook? Yep.

What’s better than actual reality? Facebook’s virtual reality, of course. Word on the Silicon Valley streets is that Facebook is concocting an application that would give viewers a “spherical” view of the social media platform on their smartphones. Think of it as Obi Wan Kenobi as a hologram—but like…with Facebook. And on a phone.

Facebook purchased the virtual reality program Oculus (as they are wont to do) last year for a cool couple of billion dollars, and immediately there was some speculation as to how the VR technology applied to Facebook’s cache of online programs. They were confident enough in Oculus to move forward with production of direct virtual reality headsets, but merely acquiring a company and allowing them to continue operating as normal has never been Facebook’s M.O.

There’s always incorporation into Facebook’s existing business model, in some form or fashion. Instagram was seamlessly integrated into Facebook’s interface. WhatsApp’s underlying tech became the framework for Facebook’s voice call application.

And now we know the plans for Oculus.

The 360 degree smartphone visual projections make perfect sense for Facebook. It takes the acquired existing technology, creates something fresh and expands the Oculus market from just gamers to every individual. It’s nothing new for Facebook, but as they’ve proven time and time again with the moves they make after acquiring other companies, it’s certainly new for us.

A New Era of Colbert

Tonight is the night! Stephen Colbert takes the reins of The Late Show, marking another impressive feat in an already extraordinary career trajectory. From The Daily Show personality (seriously how many successful careers has that program launched?) to insufferable pundit caricature on The Colbert Report, Mr. Colbert has cemented himself as one of the premier individuals in entertainment—and his legend will only continue to grow.

If you’ve never seen Stephen Colbert eviscerating Bill O’Reilly in this interview—in character, mind you—do yourself a favor and take a couple of minutes to watch. Colbert’s comedic genius is on full display, demonstrating comedic timing and irony that had even O’Reilly’s production team stifling laughter. Or if you’ve got a bit longer, take a look at Colbert headlining the 2006 White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner, delivering a blistering critique of the Bush Administration—to the Bush Administration. It’s 25 minutes of politically salient discomfort.

On The Late Show, Colbert may not need the laser-guided wit and rhetorical devices that launched his infamy on The Report, but he has shown his prowess as an adept and engaging interviewer in other arenas. Frankly, that’s got to be a relief. Masquerading as an exaggerated politico for over a decade had to be mentally exhausting, so the traditional desk-coffee-couch format has to be a relief. But it will also be a test of Colbert’s chops once he sheds the over-the-top persona.

Will America be as receptive to a toned down Colbert? Will the audience be a bit reticent, longing for the “truthiness” of the Colbert of legend? Will he find some way to incorporate “Tip of the Hat, Wag of the Finger?”

It will be an interesting pivot, that’s for sure, but if anyone can make it work—and make it feel seamless—it’s Stephen Colbert.